Sunday, June 21, 2026Vol. III · No. 172Subscribe
The Mining, Energy & Technology Wire
Mining · Analysis

Energy Security Rewrites Clean Power's Playbook

The G7 just set a hard target to cut rare earth dependence on China to 60% by 2030. Meanwhile, clean energy deployment is accelerating not because of climate goals, but because geopolitics demands it.

Energy Security Rewrites Clean Power's Playbook
PhotographThe G7 just set a hard target to cut rare earth dependence on China to 60% by 2030. Meanwhile, clean energy deployment is accelerating not because of climate goals, but because geopolitics demands it.

China controls 91% of global rare earth refining. That single number explains why the G7 spent three days in Évian, France this week hammering out a critical minerals alliance that reads less like a climate pact and more like a defense strategy.

The Group of Seven countries agreed that no single country should supply more than 60% of their imports of rare earths by 2030, with a target to push that figure to 50% as soon as possible , according to Bloomberg. Last year, China held a 59% share of rare earth mining, 91% in refining, and 94% in magnet manufacturing , the IEA estimates. Those magnets power everything from F-35 fighter jets to wind turbines to EV motors. In 2025, China imposed export controls on rare earth products, and several European and American automakers were forced to cut production due to shortages of permanent magnets , according to industry analysis. Goldman Sachs estimated that a 10% disruption in rare earth supply could result in economic output losses of up to $150 billion .

The Évian declaration, finalized June 17, is explicit about what's at stake. The G7 committed to coordinating efforts to establish the necessary processing and industrial capacities for critical minerals used in defense, EVs, clean energy, and advanced technology , OilPrice.com reported. Member governments have already announced 195 critical minerals projects since the start of 2026, totaling €64 billion in investment , according to the joint statement.

Can the West Actually Build What It Doesn't Have?

Japan offers a cautionary tale. The country was hit with a Chinese rare earth export ban in 2010 following a maritime border dispute, sparking a long effort to reduce reliance on China — yet it still sources around 75% of its imports from its neighbor , Bloomberg noted. Fifteen years of effort. Still 75% dependent.

The problem isn't mining — it's everything that comes after. Processing rare earths into usable materials, separating individual elements, and manufacturing finished components is where China's position becomes nearly unassailable, with the IEA finding that China dominates refining across 19 of 20 critical minerals, holding an average market share of approximately 70% . Even based on current globally developing projects, China's share of rare earth refining is expected to fall only from 91% to 77% by 2035 — meaning a decade from now, China will still control more than three-quarters of the world's rare earth refining capacity , according to IEA projections.

The G7 has committed to backing investment across the full supply chain, with lithium and nickel selected as pilot minerals for stockpiling because both are essential to EV battery manufacturing . The joint communique included plans to expand the role of the International Energy Agency, which last year warned that high market concentration could leave global supply chains vulnerable to potential disruptions , according to The National.

Why Small Modular Reactors Suddenly Matter

While the G7 focused on minerals, Washington is betting on a different kind of energy security: nuclear power that doesn't require a decade to build. Energy security is becoming a national defense priority as rising power demand from AI, semiconductors, manufacturing, and military operations collides with grid vulnerabilities and growing competition with China, with Small Modular Reactors being positioned as a key solution offering reliable 24/7 baseload power , OilPrice.com reported.

The United States faces a convergence of unprecedented energy demand and an electric grid that is at capacity and vulnerable to cyberattacks, physical sabotage, transmission bottlenecks, and extreme weather events, requiring dependable, 24/7 baseload power capable of supporting critical infrastructure under all conditions , according to the analysis. The pitch is straightforward: The U.S. needs faster nuclear deployment to stay competitive, with proponents arguing that NRC-approved SMR technology can help strengthen energy independence, secure critical infrastructure, and counter China's rapidly expanding nuclear and industrial footprint .

The economics are shifting, too. In the U.S., wind power has regained its position as the cheapest option for new electricity generation, overtaking gas-fired power for the first time since 2023, as recent surges in gas turbine demand driven heavily by data center expansion have doubled U.S. turbine capex in just two years , BloombergNEF reported in February.

What Happens When You Block the Cheap Stuff?

A new study from the Corporate Energy Buyers Association offers a blunt assessment of what happens if the U.S. constrains solar and wind deployment. Constraining new solar and wind resources could cost the U.S. an additional $121.2 billion in electricity and natural gas expenses from 2027 through 2033, with Americans facing at least $121.2 billion in additional energy costs over the next seven years , according to the CEBA analysis released June 11.

Constraints on new solar and wind could add $81.2 billion in electricity and natural gas costs to household energy bills over the modeled seven-year period, while commercial and industrial customers are projected to pay an additional $40 billion in electricity costs alone , the study found. The average U.S. electricity price from 2027 to 2033 could be up to 6.1% higher, rising from $37.4/MWh to $39.7/MWh .

Meanwhile, offshore wind projects that were halted by federal "stop work" orders in December are back online. Vineyard Wind 1, an 800-MW project, set a new record as the largest domestic farm to finish physical construction, while Revolution Wind became the nation's third project to begin supplying power after all 62 turbines were installed , according to Interesting Engineering. Federal judges struck down the orders for all five projects, ruling that the government hadn't presented sufficient evidence to justify the sudden shutdown, with the Natural Resources Defense Council noting that courts are preventing an unlawful, economically reckless halt , Scientific American reported.

Dominion Energy is leading the nation's largest project, the 2,600 MW Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, signaling that offshore wind is no longer a peripheral green-tech experiment but is being integrated as a core component of state and utility energy strategies , according to industry analysis.

What Changed This Week

The clean energy transition just became a supply chain war. The G7's 60% rare earth target isn't a climate goal — it's an acknowledgment that dependence on a single supplier for the materials that power both fighter jets and wind farms is a national security liability. Spain is weighing bailouts for solar developers drowning in negative power prices. The U.S. is racing to deploy gigawatt-scale offshore wind while simultaneously trying to figure out how to build batteries without Chinese minerals. The common thread: energy security, not emissions targets, is now driving deployment decisions.

What to Watch

The G7 committed to finalizing specific targets for additional critical minerals by the end of 2026. The IEA's job will be to monitor critical minerals markets, issue early warnings of supply risks, and provide analysis to support G7 policy decisions . Watch for the first lithium and nickel stockpile announcements — those pilot programs will signal whether this alliance has teeth or is just another summit communiqué. Spain's government is weighing financial support for a domestic solar industry grappling with oversupply and negative wholesale power prices, after being approached by private sector groups , Bloomberg reported June 19. And keep an eye on U.S. SMR deployment timelines — if Washington can't accelerate nuclear permitting, the "energy security as national security" argument loses credibility fast.

Original reporting and analysis by the Stake & Paper editorial team. See linked sources within the article.

Share this story

More from Stake & Paper

Was this article helpful?

ClaimWatch

Mining claims intelligence — from query to report, in minutes.

Every unpatented mining claim across all twelve BLM states. Leadfile audits, due diligence, site selection, regional prospecting, entity investigations, and AOI monitoring — delivered as complete report packages.

4.4M+
Claims Tracked
12
BLM States
7
Report Types
Request a Sample Report
Stake & Paper AM

One morning brief. The whole energy sector.

Original analysis, the day's most important wire stories, and market data — delivered before your first cup of coffee. Free.